Leica Q3-43 A Crazy Decision

I bought a Leica Q3-43. Really?? Really.

It was not a well considered decision. I did not even know about the camera and that Leica was about to develop a Q with a “normal” 43 mm lens. I did not search for information about it. It just happened.

YouTube’s algorithm in its wisdom sent me a link to Hugh Brownstone’s “3 Blind Men and an Elephant” review of a new Leica Q camera with a lens that realizes exactly the angle of view of the human eye. So what?

Hugh praised the camera. He applauded Leica. He ordered the camera. He triggered his audience. And he triggered me. I took a look at the first few online reviews of the camera (it turned out it had been delivered to retailers just 3 days before I read for the first time about it). They were stellar. The only downside was the usual one that the price is….. astronomical.

I own a Leica Q2 that I bought during Covid 4 years ago. And I love it. And I wrote about it. And I used it a lot. And I also don’t like 50mm lenses. Somehow they don’t seem to fulfill my eyes’ and brains need for a “normal lens”. I cannot even exactly say why, but I never felt entirely comfortable using a 50mm lens. For portraits until now I clearly preferred my Nikon 85mm f/1.8 lens.

And now a camera with a 43 mm lens, a compact size and a moderate weight. Improved autofocus. And a f/2 lens who’s pictures look more like a f/1.4 lens. Said the reports.

24 hours later I had ordered one from the Leica Store in Sydney. 2 days later it arrived at the post office around the corner. I will not describe in any detail how Australian Mail’s parcel Service “Starship” fucked up the one workday delivery of this camera. They have 99% bad reviews for their service. I completely understand why. But that only as a side line.

Now, 2 weeks and 1000 pictures later, I am a fan of the Leica Q3. It is amazing. The pictures are stunning. They have a sharpness not for shapness’s sake but to deliver a nearly 3 D like picture that is just amazing. The pictures have a microcontrast that is absolutely fabulous. I am using this term “microcontrast” because I have no better way of describing it. The pictures pop, they look gorgeous, have a beautiful colour rendering and are just fantastic. And 43mm seem to be for me a more acceptable lens width that I feel more comfortable with.

I am not a Leica fanboy. I use cameras in order to achieve a good result. I want files that I can edit without fearing that they fall digitally apart. I want a camera that I can use everyday and that enables me to shoot portraits, street work, landscapes, sunset, sunrises, macros and motion blur pictures alike. This is a camera that provides all that in one piece.

And I know that a good camera does not turn me into a better photographer. But it gives me the freedom of having a device that is not in my way when it comes to shooting and editing pictures. A device that does what I want it to do. And where technical limitations are not the reason for pictures that don’t look good (it is my own photographic ability that is the limiting factor; that is a good reason to try to grow).

Do we “need” a Leica Q3 camera for an exorbitant retail price? Definitely not! Do we have alternative cameras for a much more moderate price? Absolutely yes. Nikon’s Z8 is a great example. Is it a joy to use the Leica Q3-43 and to regard the results of those attempts? Yes and yes again.

I bought it. I use it. I love it.

I will write again about it after some more months.

Shooting Portraits with the Leica Q2

I bought the Leica Q2 for street photography, for landscape and travel pictures and for my ICM (intentional camera movement) work. I wanted to have a reliable full frame camera with a great lens and good file output, with files that can stand my sometimes very intense processing attempts. And admittedly I also bought the Leica for the fun of shooting with it.

What I certainly had not intended to do was using this camera for portrait photography. Everybody knows that using a 28mm wide angle lens for portraits is an impossible task, doesn’t yield good results, doesn’t make sense. Or does it??

I’ll tell you what happened. In Athens I had the opportunity of meeting Lina. Lina is an actress that I met through a friend. (Meeting friends of friends who know somebody who is somebody’s friend is one of the wonderful social accomplishments in Greece. You are not alone. You have opportunities that they create for you. Thank you so much, Loukia!). Lina agreed to participate in my Inner Core Project. However the moment we started shooting in a park in Athens it turned out that it was not the right time, nor the mood nor the intention to pursue the Inner Core idea. So the shooting turned seamlessly into a “conventional” portrait session.

The portrait shooting experience with the Q2 was the same as it had been in landscape or ICM photography. The camera was very easy to handle, I could shoot with both, viewfinder and LCD screen and it turnend out that the camera was, as should be in the best case, not in my way. Using a light weight camera like this “point and shoot” for portraits was actually a benefit in comparison to a much heavier DSLR.

Lina, Leica Q2 outdoor shot with natural light, no dishes or other equipment used

What about the pictures? That is when the big surprise happened. I was not expecting anything particular good because I knew I had the “wrong lens” in front of my camera. What I found on my computer screen were amazing pictures with a clarity, a rendering and an expression that surpassed by far what I had expected. They always talk about Leica lenses’ “micro contrast”. Here I experienced for the very first time what exactly this means. The pictures “pop” in a way that I have never seen in any other camera/lens combination before. They are just special in a wonderful, very eye pleasing way.

Lina, Leica Q2 outdoor shot, some cropping in post

And the 28mm distortion? Yes, it is there. Particularly if the photographer tries to use the full width of the picture and places his model eccentrically, to the sides of the frame. As this example shows, there can be clear distortion of the anatomy, my model’s nose does not appear straight in this picture. On the other hand, if you are aware of this phenomenon and try to avoid framing the face close to the margins of the picture and if you keep a certain distance and choose cropping in post instead of getting close to your model when taking the shot, then distortion is not a major problem. I even think that the 28mm lens emphasizes certain facial features in a way that makes a portrait more interesting.

So without even planning it I had the experience of shooting portraits with the Leica Q2. And I’ll do it again. This camera is amazing and I love exploring its possibilities further. Portrait photography entered the realm of my use of the Leica Q2.

Think out of the square. Try things out. Take the risk. That’s where creativity in photography (and so many other areas) happens. If you use a tool in an unconventional way the results will clearly surprise you. Here it was an exceptionally positive surprise.

Leica Q2 - a huge disappointment (but then....)

It’s good that I didn’t write my article about the Leica Q2 right after my first experience with it. Content and verdict would have been very different from what I am writing now. And it would not have been very flattering.

I bought a new Leica Q2 three months ago. I had been salivating for this camera for years. First I wanted the original Q, then after the release of the Q2 I desired the camera even more due to all the improvements that had been implemented. The price is steep, and that was the reason why I hesitated for so many years. But eventually I could not resist.

The timing of my purchase was a little unlucky. I bought the camera right before I started my first shootings for the “Inner Core Project”. This project requires me to be extremely swift and flexible with my camera because I leave it completely up to my “models” how they move and what they do during the shooting.

My little Ricoh GR III camera fulfills all requirements for this type of photo shoot. It is light, easy to use, I can handle it with just one hand and the menus and buttons are very intuitive. It’s the perfect camera for that purpose.

I then tried out the Q2 in this shooting environment. It was a disaster. The camera was too heavy (800 g in comparison to 420 g of the GR III), it felt clumsy and I was far too slow because I didn’t know the camera and it’s functions well enough. So I used the GR III as my main camera during the shootings and only used the Q2 for some top up pictures just to try it out.

I was pretty disappointed. I bought my dream camera and I couldn’t handle it. I found that all the raving reviews had hopelessly overrated the camera.

Then I used it for some street shots. Still I wasn’t happy, exactly for the same reasons. Too heavy, too slow, too cumbersome. Yes, nice pictures and versatile files in pp but after all a huge waste of money.

And then I took the Q2 for a whole day outdoors into nature where I used it for long exposure work with intentional camera movement (ICM) to take landscape pictures. I visited the Emsland region in Northern Germany and there particularly some moors. I had a whole day, could do things at a slow pace, could expose pictures to my liking and play with the functions of the camera. And for the first time it felt as if this camera belonged into my hands. I learned how to move it intentionally according to my needs for blur effects. I changed exposure times, used the pop up menus on the screen and found that I could create a well working workflow.

And when I started processing the files some days later it was a revelation. It’s the best ICM pictures I have ever taken. The colors that I found in the RAW files are amazing. I only need to process them slightly in Lightroom and maybe give them some touch ups in Photoshop. I am a black and white photographer and in the past I found colour files difficult to handle. But that’s not the case with these Leica files. They shine and the colors pop in a beautiful way. It’s actually a joy to work with them.

ICM landscape picture shot with Leica Q2

The details in these pictures are absolutely amazing. I can create effects that I was not able to bring about with any other camera. I would call these pictures “dense”. There is so much information in them that they have an amazing expression.

So I was able to create a series that is to my full satisfaction. I love the ICM aspect, I love the colors and I was able to create a consistent series.

ICM landscape picture taken with Leica Q2

After that weekend I have changed my mind. This camera does live up to its expectations. You only need to be able to define the best use for it. And as with all tools you need to be able to handle it. Any camera is only as good as the person that uses it. I will certainly try again to use it for shooting people. Maybe with a little more experience with my new tool the results will be more satisfying.

My first disappointment has disappeared. I am keen on using the Q2 again. Next weekend I will be going to the Teufelsmoor (devil’s moore) and shoot like hell....